A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among potential neighbours more than the development of a wall at a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted countrywide focus following an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments post about René Collier as well as the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a remarkably publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development will work at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to develop their spouse and children household. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, in which enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established people. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their future neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing permission by creating a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, resulting in an encroachment on the Particular Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore regions are issue to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, significantly in a very delicate coastal surroundings for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially constructed, is in the proper posture. Their authorized group has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their watch, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal arranging disputes, the place views of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic initiatives by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods, a picture which has since develop into emblematic of the intensity with the dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Guys entered the water in the course of extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the positioning became Among the most hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely observed that these actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a location impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up protected in detail with the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to know the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant while in the legal timeline.
In the core with the dispute is a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as built, goes over and above what was permitted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A personal look at, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 their extended-standing relationship to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair merely endeavoring to produce a loved ones residence in accordance Using the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Special Space of Conservation and say that all operates are actually completed dependant on Experienced assistance and authorized options. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, never change the underlying specifics.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than development of wall at coastal web site happens to be a shorthand description for your circumstance that numerous observers see as progressively typical. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Moments article about René Collier pointed out which the businessman experienced Beforehand been linked to local advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly diverse Qualified backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are getting to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times and René Collier waded by waistline-higher water in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both equally the physical fact in the coastline along with the symbolic character from the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the result remains unsure. The court have to figure out if the wall as created complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Exclusive Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and setting up conditions. However the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Reside along with each other lengthy once the authorized costs happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design works at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case prolong further than that handle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. It also underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary challenges for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre with the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Whether it is going to eventually be altered, eliminated, or done as planned will rely upon the court’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will most likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more closely viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin lately.